EasySpecs Labs

Operate the control plane for agentic coding at org scale.

Your team already ships with agents — now the bottleneck is visibility, orchestration, and governance across squads. In two days on your stack, stand up the control plane: monitor fleets, route work, enforce gates, and scale agentic solutions without review collapse.

  • €7,995
  • 2 days

Business outcome

Leadership gets dashboards they can defend — run health, cost, and quality signals — while engineers operate multi-agent workflows with explicit handoffs, audit trails, and merge policy instead of babysitting chat threads squad by squad.

What you leave with

  • Control plane skeleton checked into your repository — routing, policy hooks, and run contracts
  • Multi-agent orchestration patterns with explicit handoffs your team can extend squad by squad
  • Observability baseline — run logs, quality signals, and a dashboard template leadership can review
  • Governance gates and audit-trail patterns for merge-worthy agent output at org scale
  • Scaling playbook for champions rolling the control plane to adjacent teams
  • Written operating guide versioned next to the code — not a slide deck that ages in a drive folder

Workshop curriculum

Two-day control plane curriculum

Advanced block for teams past the first agent loops — orchestration, observability, and governance on your repository and toolchain, not another prompting refresher.

  • Control plane architecture

    Separate orchestration from execution: routers, policy layers, and run contracts so agent fleets stay inspectable when models, IDEs, or squads change.

  • Multi-agent orchestration at scale

    Planner, implementer, reviewer, and tool-runner roles with explicit handoffs — graph-style workflows, parallel worktrees, and isolation patterns that survive real backlog volume.

  • Observability and run monitoring

    Traces, run logs, cost and latency signals, and quality dashboards leadership can trust — so “agentic coding at scale” is measurable, not folklore.

  • Governance gates and audit trails

    When agents may open PRs, merge, or touch production paths; holdout scenarios, approval chains, and evidence packs for regulated or high-stakes codebases.

  • Operating agentic coding across teams

    Champion models, shared standards, and rollout playbooks so squads inherit the same control plane instead of reinventing private agent workflows every sprint.

Key metrics

  • Investment: €7,995 · 2 days · up to 12 participants
  • Conservative payback: ~3 weeks when cross-squad review firefighting drops
  • Year 1 ROI (conservative): 8×–22× vs. workshop cost
  • Delivery: on-site or remote · control plane artifacts land in your repository

When to use this program

When agent loops work in one squad but fail to scale — review queues spike, nobody trusts cross-team agent output, or leadership needs visibility before funding immersion or embed.

Conservative ROI scenario

Three weeks to pay back a €7,995 control plane workshop

Conservative scenario: a platform team of six plus two squads each reclaim four hours per week previously lost to untracked agent runs, duplicate context, and cross-team review churn — roughly €7,995 equivalent in three weeks at typical loaded rates, then compounding as the control plane rolls to adjacent teams.

Agentic Coding Coaching

Workshops are coached by senior EasySpecs practitioners — product, structured requirements, and platform architecture at the table with your team, not junior facilitators reading slides.

  • Portrait of Xesca Alabart, EasySpecs Labs coaching lead

    Xesca Alabart

    Lead coach — product & requirements · CEO, EasySpecs

    Xesca combines product leadership with requirements engineering, helping teams turn business intent into explicit objectives and acceptance signals agents can work against—not vague chat prompts. She facilitates mixed rooms of engineering, product, and design while keeping a sharp definition of what “done” means.

    • Aligns engineering, product, and design without diluting technical depth
    • Brings structured requirements practice into AI-assisted delivery
    • Based in Barcelona; delivers in English, Spanish, or Catalan as needed
    LinkedIn
  • Portrait of Carlos Guirao, EasySpecs Labs coaching lead

    Carlos Guirao

    Carlos Guirao Capistany

    Lead coach — platform & agent workflows · CTO, EasySpecs

    Carlos architects EasySpecs’ platform and AI systems with an emphasis on safe, reviewable change in mature codebases. He focuses on boundaries, APIs, and verification so agentic engineering produces diffs your team can trust—not opaque churn.

    • Systems and integration architecture for complex products
    • Hands-on with agent workflows, tools, and how they land in your repository
    • Leads the technical spine behind Application Mapping and agent-ready context
    LinkedIn

FAQ

How is this different from the Development Team Workshop?

The dev workshop (€4,995) builds first agent loops and review rituals on your repo. Control Plane at Scale (€7,995) adds orchestration, observability, and governance across squads. Context Engineering & Token Optimization (€4,995) in Optimize addresses layered context and token economics once agents run at scale.

How is this different from Custom Team Immersion or Embedded Implementation?

Immersion (€16,800) and embedded (€4,995 + €2,000/month) go wider and longer — cross-functional depth or daily pairing inside delivery. Control Plane is a focused two-day advanced workshop for platform and engineering leads who need the operating layer before or instead of a longer engagement.

Can we run this before embedded implementation?

Yes — many orgs run Control Plane after the dev workshop when multiple squads adopt agents and leadership needs visibility and gates before a four-week embed. Context Engineering in Optimize often follows when token and context cost need engineering discipline org-wide.